Audio of the shooting that took the life of Chicago police officer Enrique Martinez. It reflects the climate “progressive prosecutors” have created by criminally charging police officers for doing their job. A climate where officers second guess themselves and place themselves in danger by waiting to take action.
[The confirmation email comes from Civist. Sometimes it arrives in the inbox. Sometimes in the spam folder. Sometimes it is sent right away. Sometimes several hours later.]
The rise of “progressive prosecutors” who criminally charge police officers for use of force when such force is necessary to protect themselves or others—has created an unsustainable environment for law enforcement professionals. Officers are finding themselves vulnerable to criminal prosecutions based on split-second decisions, which, despite adhering to training and policy, leads to their freedom being taken. This is driving experienced officers out of the profession and worsening recruitment challenges. The fear of criminal charges for proper actions taken in the line of duty adds to an environment that leaves communities with seriously understaffed police departments.
They also raise serious concerns about justice. When officers, who have acted in good faith and within policy, face criminal charges, unjust convictions are the result.
To address this continuing abuse of prosecutorial discretion, the proposed Police Officer Self-Defense Protection Act provides a balanced approach that upholds both officer protections and public accountability. The proposed legislation is here.
The Act establishes federal preemption providing immunity from local prosecution when justified self-defense criteria are met.
Overall, the Police Officer Self-Defense Protection Act offers a sensible, necessary solution to protect officers while preserving public accountability, aiming to rebuild trust within the profession and encourage recruitment by ensuring officers are shielded from unwarranted criminal charges when acting in legitimate self-defense.
